Irish construction cross border trade and brexit: Practitioner perceptions on the periphery of Europe

Brooks, T; Scott, L; Spillane, J P and Hayward, K (2020) Irish construction cross border trade and brexit: Practitioner perceptions on the periphery of Europe. Construction Management and Economics, 38(1), pp. 71-90. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The United Kingdom (UK) Brexit vote of June 2016 has created unprecedented uncertainty in the construction industry in Ireland but little research to date has been undertaken on existing construction trading patterns and the potential effects of regulatory divergence and other non-tariff barriers in Ireland in this context. In response, this study uses mixed methods to fill this gap in knowledge. The experience of nine construction industry interviewees is probed–five based in Northern Ireland (in the UK) and four from Ireland, which will remain in the EU after the UK leaves. The researchers' analysis of the qualitative data generated themes which were tested through investigation of the 101 eligible responses gathered through an online questionnaire. Our findings demonstrate that the construction trade in Ireland is highly mobile, currently trading extensively North–South and East–West. The physical barrier of the Irish Sea is less of a hindrance to trade than the regulatory barrier of the Irish border. Trade from peripheral areas is drawn to economic centres in Dublin and GB. In the view of the respondents, Brexit will impose further non-tariff barriers, although it is difficult to predict and plan for these barriers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: brexit; construction; cross-border trade; Ireland; uncertainty
Index terms: United Kingdom, questionnaire, practitioner, Northern Ireland, mixed method, Europe, construction industry, Ireland, investigation
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, Geography, physical geography and landforms, industry analysis
Topics: Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here