"Shared sense of purposefulness": A new concept to understand the practice of coordinating design in construction

Çıdık, M S and Boyd, D (2020) "Shared sense of purposefulness": A new concept to understand the practice of coordinating design in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 38(1), pp. 18-31. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Construction management literature sees the collective task of coordinating design as being about the “'integration'” of “fragmented” discipline-specific design tasks/outputs, thus overlooking the important role of social interactions. This is not only conceptually problematic but also presents a practical management problem. As a response, a practice-based approach, which relies on a “becoming” ontology, is adopted for a practical explanation of design coordination for more effective design management. The adopted methodology suggests that design develops as a result of unfolding (path-dependent) individual actions and interdisciplinary interactions. Based on this, the concept of a “shared sense of purposefulness” is proposed to refer to the temporary and precarious organizational state of a design team in which each of the interacting team members has achieved a state of purposefulness to resume individual action. Hence, design coordination in construction is redefined as continuously re-establishing and maintaining “a shared sense of purposefulness”. The concept’s usefulness for understanding the practice of design coordination is demonstrated using data collected from a project in the UK. The discussion enables fresh insights into the everyday operation of design coordination. It is concluded that the proposed conception paves a way forward both for the research and practice in construction design management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; design coordination; design management; organizational analysis; practice-based study; sensemaking
Index terms: sensemaking, ontology, design team, design management, integration, methodology, becoming, organizational analysis, social interaction, coordination, interaction
Subjects: design process, research methods, management, education and knowledge transfer, behavioral psychology, philosophical process, cognitive psychology, sociology, organizational analysis, business, professional practice
Topics: Research Practice, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here