Hallowell, M R; Bhandari, S and Alruqi, W (2020) Methods of safety prediction: Analysis and integration of risk assessment, leading indicators, precursor analysis, and safety climate. Construction Management and Economics, 38(4), pp. 308-321. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Construction safety prediction is an emerging field where various forms of information and analytical techniques are used to predict the likelihood or severity of a future injury. A review of this literature reveals that even though the approaches are used for the same goal of predicting future safety outcomes, they are modeled independently and exclusively from one another. To organize thinking in safety prediction, the literature is organized into four operationally-defined predictive families: (1) safety risk assessment, which considers the characteristics and dangers of the work; (2) precursor analysis, which considers the conditions of the workers; (3) leading indicators, which consider the quantity of safety management activities; and (4) safety climate assessments, which considers worker perceptions of safety. Additionally, a unified model is proposed where the four families are considered together and opportunities for synergy and cross-validation are exploited. Researchers may benefit from this model as they create points of departure, propose and test novel approaches, and attempt to contextualize their findings within the existing body of literature. Furthermore, practitioners may use the model to make more accurate and robust safety predictions that account for the interconnectedness of the work attributes, human resources, and management strategies that affect safety.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy assessment; leading indicators; precursor analysis; safety climate; safety risk |
| Index terms: | risk assessment, synergy, management strategy, integration, human resource, practitioner, validation, safety management, construction safety, safety climate, injury |
| Subjects: | practitioner, health safety and environment, professional development, financial risk, management, environmental health, partnership management, organizational analysis, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here