Abusive supervisors and employee work-to-family conflict in Chinese construction projects: How does family support help?

Ju, L; Zhao, W; Wu, C; Li, H and Ning, X (2020) Abusive supervisors and employee work-to-family conflict in Chinese construction projects: How does family support help? Construction Management and Economics, 38(12), pp. 1158-1178. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Work to family conflict (WFC) experienced by employees working in the construction industry has received significant attention from researchers. However, workplace bullying and incivility are rarely considered in relation to WFC, and even more rarely in the context of Chinese construction. Consequently, this study aims to examine how abusive supervisors can influence WFC for employees. Through two surveys of Chinese construction workers, this study analyses the mediation effect of employee psychological distress, and the moderation mechanism of employee family support on the relationship between abusive supervision and employee WFC. The findings show that abusive supervision is positively related to employee WFC, and employees' psychological distress mediates this relationship significantly. Employee family support moderates the direct and indirect relationship between abusive supervision and employee WFC. Understanding how abusive supervision influences employee WFC is useful for both its theoretical and practical implications, particularly in effectively relieving employee work pressure, reducing the transfer of individual stress into the family domain, promoting employee well-being, and improving construction project performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: abusive supervision; construction projects; family support; psychological distress; work to family conflict
Index terms: supervision, supervisor, construction worker, construction industry, survey, mediation, construction project, well-being, psychological distress
Subjects: production management, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, practitioner, dispute resolution, control systems
Topics: Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here