Lingard, H; Wakefield, R and Walker, D (2020) The client's role in promoting work health and safety in construction projects: Balancing contracts and relationships to effect change. Construction Management and Economics, 38(11), pp. 993-1008. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
It is increasingly expected that public sector clients embed work health and safety (WHS) into procurement and project management practices for infrastructure/engineering construction projects. Client practices in relation to the management of WHS were examined in a longitudinal case study conducted in a public infrastructure programme of work in Australia. Control mechanisms for WHS at the client-contractor boundary were explored over a 12-month period. Interviews were held with representatives of client and contractor organisations. Formal control mechanisms were implemented. Initially, the implementation of formal controls created tension at the client-contractor interface as it was interpreted as signalling a lack of trust and client interference with contractors' processes. However, these tensions were alleviated through the development of interpersonal relationships between client and contractor personnel at a local project level. The resolution of issues at the client-contractor interface was facilitated by individuals who engaged in boundary spanning behaviours to facilitate knowledge sharing and coordination of effort on both sides. Relationship-based control mechanisms supplemented the use of formal controls and enhanced the client’s ability to influence contractors' WHS practices. The study provides important new knowledge regarding the client’s role in driving WHS performance in infrastructure/engineering construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client requirements; control mechanisms; health and safety; procurement; relationships |
| Index terms: | public infrastructure, implementation, public-sector client, case study, Australia, knowledge sharing, client requirements, construction project, resolution, interpersonal relationship, programme, project management practice, personnel, contractor organization, health and safety, interview, boundary spanning, coordination |
| Subjects: | management, professional development, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, production management, behavioral psychology, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, project management theory and practice, knowledge management, data collection methods, organization, project controls, Geography, conflict resolution |
| Topics: | Time Control, Geographical Context, Procurement, Human Resources, Project Management, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here