Liu, B; Wang, Q; Wu, G; Zheng, J and Li, L (2020) How family-supportive supervisor affect Chinese construction workers' work-family conflict and turnover intention: Investigating the moderating role of work and family identity salience. Construction Management and Economics, 38(9), pp. 807-823. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Work-family conflict and high turnover intention of construction workers have been and will continue to be significant concerns in the construction industry. To explore antecedents of work-family conflict and identify which workers are more likely to exit their organisations when they experience work-family conflict, this study examines how family-supportive supervisor (FSS) affects construction workers' work-family conflict and turnover intention, and how identity salience moderates the relationship between work-family conflict and turnover intention. Data were collected from a sample of 271 construction workers. The results revealed that family-supportive supervisor reduced work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC), which in turn predicted turnover intention. The results further suggested that construction workers with low work identity salience or high family identity salience were more likely to exit their organisation when they experienced WFC. Moreover, workers with high work identity salience reported a greater level of turnover intention when they experienced FWC. Findings will help managers in construction organisations deepen their understanding of work-family conflict.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction worker; family identity salience; family-supportive supervisor; turnover intention; work identity salience; work-family conflict |
| Index terms: | manager, turnover, work-family conflict, construction organization, construction industry, supervisor, construction worker, identity |
| Subjects: | business management, practitioner, organization, industry analysis, sociology, management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here