Unravelling the influence of teamwork on trade crew productivity: A review and a proposed framework

Loganathan, S and Forsythe, P (2020) Unravelling the influence of teamwork on trade crew productivity: A review and a proposed framework. Construction Management and Economics, 38(11), pp. 1040-1060. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Research in construction labour productivity (CLP) has paid little attention to the social and behavioural aspects of onsite, physical, construction trade crews. The mainstream organisational and management literature provides an alternative line of inquiry where trade crews can be conceptualised as teams. By taking this perspective, the behaviours and interdependencies among crew members can be more readily understood in terms of influences on CLP. Using a structured review methodology, a conceptual framework is developed in stages by merging the concepts of teamwork and CLP. The framework begins with a broad scaffolding that draws together two established models: the input-mediators-output model and the big five framework. The more detailed and explanatory contribution uses these from the literature to identify a set of task-focussed and relationship-focussed team processes. A key benefit of the framework is that crew teamwork can be used as a means of mediating what was previously many separate CLP variables. Importantly, the proposed framework views teamwork in the context of trade crews as against viewing teamwork as a professional or managerially focussed phenomenon. To this end, this paper advances three research propositions and methodological possibilities which in future research could be tested to tailor the framework for best fit.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction labour productivity; crew behaviour; crew interdependence; teamwork; trade crews
Index terms: scaffolding, conceptual framework, methodology, productivity, teamwork, crew productivity, onsite, mediator, interdependence, construction labour
Subjects: dispute resolution, operations management, research methods, theoretical framing, management, building construction, organizational analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here