Papachristos, G; Jain, N; Burman, E; Zimmermann, N; Wu, X; Liu, P; Mumovic, D; Lin, B; Davies, M and Edkins, A (2020) Low carbon building performance in the construction industry: A multi-method approach of system dynamics and building performance modelling. Construction Management and Economics, 38(9), pp. 856-876. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The construction industry contributes significantly to energy consumption and carbon emissions. Moreover, people spend more time inside buildings, so their health is increasingly influenced by indoor environmental conditions. When considered through these lenses, the concept of total building performance can span energy consumption, the associated CO2 emissions, and indoor environmental quality (IEQ). At the individual project level, building underperformance with respect to energy and IEQ is frequent, and the ex post performance gap is partially attributed to the construction project management and operations phase of the building lifecycle. This underperformance motivates the research of this paper into the construction process outcomes in terms of energy performance and IEQ, and ways to reduce the performance gap. The paper develops a multi-methodology framework to analyse the effect of building development project process on energy performance and IEQ from an operations management perspective. The framework couples system dynamics modelling of construction project management to building performance modelling. The paper details the way they are coupled, the application steps and data requirements, so that they can be applied on a case by case basis. The aim is to combine operations management to building performance disciplines and deliver insights for industry practitioners and policy makers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building performance; low-zero carbon; project management; simulation; system dynamics |
| Index terms: | building performance, environmental conditions, operations management, ex-post performance, practitioner, performance gap, methodology, construction process, system dynamics, low-carbon building, CO2 emissions, carbon emission, project management, construction industry, modelling, energy performance, construction project management, lifecycle, indoor environmental quality, energy consumption |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, project delivery, energy systems, environmental science, air quality, computing systems, practitioner, climate science, building construction, environmental health, quality assurance, industry analysis, performance management, research methods, design practice, management, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here