Watchman, M; Demers, C M H and Potvin, A (2022) Biophilia in school buildings: Towards a simplified assessment method based on spatial geometry. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(4), pp. 434-452. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Renovating school buildings offers the potential to increase the visual, thermal and auditory well-being of students and school staff through biophilic design. Biophilic design guidelines generally describe the natural features in buildings and the intended experiences for occupants. As limited guidelines specify measurable architectural characteristics, this study discusses methodological explorations to identify potential biophilic qualities of buildings in the early stages of renovation projects, before in-depth post-occupancy evaluations and site visits. This research critically analyses plans, sections and elevations based on building certification standards and bioclimatic design principles. The simplicity of the assessment method aims to facilitate a preliminary evaluation of numerous and diverse schools in Quebec, Canada. The results from a case study of three primary schools showed that the quantitative information in architectural drawings can serve to identify challenges and opportunities for direct experiences of natural features, such as sunlight, outdoor views and fresh air. This exploration illustrates a replicable process to capture measurable architectural parameters with the potential to foster experiences of nature.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architectural evaluation; biophilic design; cold climate; renovation; school buildings; well-being |
| Index terms: | school building, exploration, renovation, well-being, biophilic, bioclimatic design, cold climate, geometry, certification, biophilia, case study, sunlight, Canada, drawing, post-occupancy evaluation |
| Subjects: | mental health and wellbeing, mathematical modelling, construction type, data collection methods, human factors and perception, climate science, design incorporating nature, technical documentation, sustainability and energy, environmental resource management, evaluation methods, renewable energy, renovation and retrofit, Geography, administrative processes |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Contract Administration, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here