The power of humour to unite and divide: A case study of design coordination meetings in construction

Ponton, H; Osborne, A; Thompson, N and Greenwood, D (2020) The power of humour to unite and divide: A case study of design coordination meetings in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 38(1), pp. 32-54. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Design coordination meetings are the formal discussion venues that support interdisciplinary group interaction during the construction process. Social behaviour needs to be recognized, understood, and evaluated by group members if meetings are to be productive. The role of humour during the practice of coordinating building design has not previously been studied. A non-participant observation method was used to collect qualitative data from consecutive contractor-led design team meetings during a live building project. Using a 360° panoramic video-recording camera, episodes of humour were captured and collated into packets of rich data. These packets were then organized, structured, and analysed using NVivo computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software. The results of the analysis showed that instances of humour do not happen at random but at specific times when they performed distinct functions to facilitate the design coordination process. One notable example was the role of humour in helping to form a cohesive team that was able to manage conflict successfully and thus engender a positive cultural environment. The inclusive findings of the study have demonstrated that humour is a functional aspect of group dynamics during the coordination of design in construction that can influence social interaction and task-related performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cohesion; conflict; construction design; humour; interdisciplinary team
Index terms: social interaction, coordination, interaction, case study, building design, group dynamics, social behaviour, construction process, cohesion, design team, data analysis, observation
Subjects: data collection methods, architectural design, data analysis and analytics, professional practice, structural engineering, management, behavioral psychology, sociology, building construction
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here