Steinhardt, D; Manley, K; Bildsten, L and Widen, K (2020) The structure of emergent prefabricated housing industries: A comparative case study of Australia and Sweden. Construction Management and Economics, 38(6), pp. 483-501. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Prefabricated housing is a disruptive innovation struggling to take hold in a traditional complex product system (CoPS). It is quicker to produce and has improved environmental performance compared to traditional housing. CoPS have more dense and complex network connections than commodity industries, making disruptive innovation more difficult. Effective relational capabilities can achieve the coordination necessary to address this challenge. The prefabricated housing industry needs to develop a structure that drives these capabilities. Using a case study methodology, the structure of the industry is examined in two contrasting countries, namely Australia and Sweden, as they represent an early and late stage of industry emergence, respectively. A new framework is proposed for this purpose, enabling a repeatable, orderly and comprehensive disaggregation of industry structure to examine the latent drivers of relational capability. The main empirical contribution is to (1) describe an industry that is yet to be formally recognized by national statistical agencies and (2) show how the adoption of prefabricated housing can be accelerated. The study found that younger industries need a focused industry association with diverse membership to act as an effective system integrator.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; complex product systems; housing; industry; innovation; prefabrication; relationships; Sweden |
| Index terms: | methodology, emergence, housing, agency, case study, environmental performance, Sweden, Australia, complex product system, disaggregation, coordination, prefabrication |
| Subjects: | construction type, data collection methods, data science, innovation and technology management, research methods, sustainability assessment, management, Geography, sociology, building construction, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here