Populating the social realm: New roles arising from social procurement

Troje, D and Gluch, P (2020) Populating the social realm: New roles arising from social procurement. Construction Management and Economics, 38(1), pp. 55-70. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Employment requirements, as part of social procurement, are increasingly used in construction procurement as a tool to mitigate issues of exclusion on the job market. To create a better understanding how employment requirements nurtures a new type of actor, here named the “employment requirement professional” (ERP), the aim of this paper is to study how this role is framed in terms of work practices and professional identity. Building on 21 semi-structured interviews in the Swedish construction sector, a detailed account of who works with employment requirements, how and why they conduct their work is provided. The findings show how ERPs mediate between contrasting interests when they create new social procurement roles and practices; how they enact different approaches to promote social sustainability, how their roles are formed by multiple and reciprocal lines of actions, and how they make sense of who they are and what type of work they engage in. The research contributes to a discussion on effects from social procurement in construction and the emergence of a new professional role, their identity and work practices.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: employment requirements; identity; practices; professional roles; social procurement
Index terms: interview, work practice, emergence, construction sector, employment, identity, construction procurement, social sustainability
Subjects: industry analysis, communities and social development, systems engineering, sociology, management, contractual arrangements, data collection methods
Topics: Organizational Design, Human Resources, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here