af Hällström, A; Bosch-Sijtsema, P; Poblete, L; Rempling, R and Karlsson, M (2021) The role of social ties in collaborative project networks: A tale of two construction cases. Construction Management and Economics, 39(9), pp. 723-738. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Collaborative project delivery models (CPDMs) are increasing in popularity as infrastructure construction projects become more complex and grow in scale and scope. CPDMs build on high levels of trust, information exchange and formal contractual relations, creating complex relationships between actors in the project network. The literature emphasizes the procurement phase and contractual aspects of CPDMs; however, few studies explicitly focus on the role of social relationships in CPDM projects. Social network theory has recently been introduced in the architecture, engineering and construction industry industry to study relationships between network actors, but the role of social ties within CPDM project networks is still unclear. Through two qualitative case studies, we have analyzed the role of social ties in projects applying a CPDM contract. The empirical evidence of 41 semi-structured interviews and observations points to aspects that affect the development of social ties in CPDMs, such as initial project setup, project identification, perception of actors, resource sharing and shared space, as well as the importance of formal and informal ties for supporting collaborative project practices. The evidence shows how social ties develop into negative or positive bonds affecting the level of collaboration. This study contributes by emphasizing the interplay between project networks using CPDMs and social ties.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; project networks; relational contracting; relational project delivery arrangement; social ties |
| Index terms: | relational contracting, case study, social network theory, collaborative project, construction industry, project delivery, interview, project network, information exchange, collaboration, social ties, evidence, infrastructure construction, contractual relations |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, sociology, management, contract law, civil engineering, data science, project planning, contractual arrangements, project delivery, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here