Barriers hindering acceptance of earth construction in the urban context of the United Kingdom

Zami, M S (2022) Barriers hindering acceptance of earth construction in the urban context of the United Kingdom. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(6), pp. 941-958. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Earth material is environmentally more sustainable than traditional building materials, such as bricks and blocks. The benefits of earth construction are multiple, especially with regard to the uniqueness as a way of preserving the artisanship and cultural values of architectural heritage. Unfortunately, construction professionals in the United Kingdom are unfamiliar with many aspects of earthen architecture. A number of interrelated barriers inhibit the acceptance of earth-based material and make it an unpopular choice among construction professionals in the UK. The aim of this study is to develop an understanding of such barriers by identifying and analysing them in light of perceptions held across societies, cultures, and acceptability among professionals. To get to the aim, an interpretivist philosophical stance was taken in this research and a critical analysis of up-to-date literature on various barriers was carried out. The Delphi technique and in-depth interviews were then overseen to substantiate which barriers hindering the acceptability of earth-based material in UK urban construction. A series of interconnected barriers such as, absence of supply chain networks, prejudicial conflict, reticence to changing familiar methods of construction as well as lack of knowledge, skill, and training were identified by experts as the key factors hindering the acceptability of earth-based construction material in the UK.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: acceptability; barriers; earth construction; environmental sustainability; hinder; urban
Index terms: United Kingdom, society, interview, environmental sustainability, Delphi technique, construction material, traditional building, construction professional
Subjects: building materials, construction type, data collection methods, communities and social development, professional development, health safety and environment, Geography
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here