Cost-benefit analysis of BIM-enabled design clash detection and resolution

Chahrour, R; Hafeez, M A; Ahmad, A M; Sulieman, H I; Dawood, H; Rodriguez-Trejo, S; Kassem, M; Naji, K K and Dawood, N (2021) Cost-benefit analysis of BIM-enabled design clash detection and resolution. Construction Management and Economics, 39(1), pp. 55-72. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Building Information Modelling (BIM) is increasingly deployed as part of the processes in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry projects. While the benefits of BIM have been extensively proclaimed, explicit justification in terms of direct cost savings for BIM implementation on real-life projects, particularly for clash detection BIM workstream, are not well documented. This paper proposes and demonstrates a methodology to prove how BIM-based clash detection leads to cost savings. A schema is developed based on literature review and industrial expertise to quantify cost savings achieved by the utilisation of BIM-based clash detection and resolution. This paper provides validation of the proposed schema on a major infrastructure project. The developed schema includes the categorisation of identified clashes based on stakeholder involvement and required actions. The validation used the estimated cost of clashes were those not resolved before site operations took place. This schema simplifies both the categorisation and cost estimation of clashes in design. Estimated savings yielded 20% of contract value using the schema, for the multi-million-dollar project case study, thus extending evidence of BIM savings and benefits. The schema improves the existing process and valorises clash detection, thus allowing stakeholders to conduct a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the categorisation methodology allows prioritising on the most costly clashes, and draw lessons learnt for further projects. This schema opens the path towards a systematic methodology to appraise the benefits of different BIM uses or processes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM case study; BIM savings; building information modelling; clash detection; cost benefit analysis; cost estimation
Index terms: cost benefit analysis, cost estimating, literature review, methodology, validation, evidence, stakeholder involvement, building information modelling, prioritizing, case study, direct cost, savings, site operation, implementation, cost saving, resolution, infrastructure project
Subjects: operations management, economic analysis, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, participation process, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, decision analysis, conflict resolution, information systems, infrastructure and transport systems, economics, research methods, professional development
Topics: Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here