Chen, Y; Chen, Y; Smyth, H and Fu, Y (2021) Enforcement against contract violation in Chinese construction projects: Impacts of trust and perceived intentionality. Construction Management and Economics, 39(8), pp. 687-703. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Violations happen frequently in construction projects due to opportunistic intentions and/or the lack of awareness of obligations and/or honest attempts to react to unforeseen circumstances. Dealing with contract violations plays an important role in managing projects. The aim of the research is to investigate the impact of trust, analyzed in terms of the goodwill-based and competence-based trust, on both contract and social enforcement after a contract violation. A questionnaire survey, partially based on semi-structured interviews, was used for data collection. All the data is from the Chinese construction industry since it provides a fertile context to explore the research questions. The results show that: 1) reputation is used as social enforcement in practice and the severity of it is reflected by the scope of the disclosure, 2) the two dimensions of trust have opposite influences on the severity of contract and social enforcement via different mediating effects of perceived intentionality. Specifically, goodwill-based trust reduces the severity of enforcement via decreasing perceived intentionality, while competence-based trust increases the severity of enforcement by increasing perceived intentionality. A comprehensive and nuanced understanding for managing contract violation is generated in this research, which will help project managers to manage the contract violation and the interfirm relationships more effectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contract enforcement; contractual breach; perceived intentionality; social enforcement; trust |
| Index terms: | violation, questionnaire, interfirm relationship, construction project, competence, survey, interview, construction industry, enforcement, dimension, project manager |
| Subjects: | business, profession, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, personnel development, health safety and environment, production management, regulatory law, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Legal Issues, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here