Çıdık, M S and Phillips, S (2021) Buildings as complex systems: The impact of organisational culture on building safety. Construction Management and Economics, 39(12), pp. 972-987. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
High-risk buildings can be considered as complex systems involving various social actors and technology, which draws attention to the organisational and social underpinnings of their safety. This research draws on complex systems theory and high reliability organisations (HRO) literature to develop insights into the cultural aspects of safety management and regulation of high-risk buildings. Ten semi-structured interviews were undertaken to explore the opinions and experiences of built environment professionals in England about the ongoing regulatory changes regarding high-risk buildings following the tragic fire at Grenfell Tower. The findings expose some aspects of the organisational culture that underpin the safety-related behaviour in high-risk building life cycle in England, which are incompatible with those that underpin HRO. The findings also show how the studied regulatory changes are subsumed by this organisational culture and fail to deliver their intention. Hence, the paper establishes organisational culture of the building life cycle as a key consideration for safety management and regulation of high-risk buildings. The conclusion calls for future regulatory, practical and research efforts to develop a better appreciation of the organisational culture, and to aim for measures to cultivate a culture that enables collective mindfulness.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building regulations; building safety; complex systems; high reliability organisations; organisational culture |
| Index terms: | building regulation, England, mindfulness, building life cycle, complex system, built environment, interview, regulation, safety management, organizational culture |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, health conditions and diseases, asset management, sociology, occupational health and safety management, systems engineering, political science, infrastructure and transport systems, regulatory law, Geography |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Governance, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here