Implementing circularity in the construction process: A case study examining the reorganization of multi-actor environment and the decision-making process

Gerding, D P; Wamelink, H and Leclercq, E M (2021) Implementing circularity in the construction process: A case study examining the reorganization of multi-actor environment and the decision-making process. Construction Management and Economics, 39(7), pp. 617-635. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Circularity aims to make waste obsolete by both closing and narrowing resource loops and by extending the lifespan of materials and products. This fundamentally different approach to construction practices necessitates a completely different method of organising the construction process. The rounds of decision-making undertaken by different actors at particular moments in the construction process have a significant role to play in this regard. Consequently, this research aims to analyse current circular practices for both the multi-actor environment and the decision-making process. An analytical framework is developed based on the theoretically-informed assumption that actors are responsible for decision-making and that circular strategies are an effective means through which to integrate circularity within the construction process. This analytical framework is applied to three circular building cases in the Netherlands, by drawing upon stakeholder interviews and documentation. It can be concluded that: some conventional actors have acquired knowledge on circularity; and that there is an emergent group of expert actors specialising in circularity. Both types of actors are a prerequisite for implementing circular strategies at both the beginning and end-of-life phase of a building; and should be involved early on to influence decision-making on circularity, especially concerning the long-lived layers of a building.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: actor analysis; circular construction; decision-making; network analysis; sustainable building practices
Index terms: analytical framework, sustainable building practice, decision-making, construction process, drawing, Netherlands, strategy, documentation, interview, lifespan, decision-making process, circularity, network analysis, case study
Subjects: technical documentation, sustainability and energy, material degradation and durability, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, sustainable materials, decision analysis, building construction, management, professional development, Geography
Topics: Design Practice, Site Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here