Asgari, S and Noorzai, E (2023) Improving the effectiveness and interaction between building information modeling and life cycle assessment. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(1), pp. 22-38. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Improving the environmental impact of the construction industry is a very significant way to achieve sustainability. The combination of building information modeling and life cycle assessment leads to improve the environmental performance of buildings. However, preliminary measures to achieve sustainability require complete knowledge and classification of building information modeling uses and environmental indicators. For this purpose, it is necessary to identify and prioritize building information modeling capabilities and environmental indicators in the early stages of design. A questionnaire was designed to survey experts in this field. By evaluating the building information modeling criteria and life cycle evaluation, using the Structural equation modeling method, it was found that 3D coordination, Phase planning, and Design reviews are the most important in the success of the project. In terms of life cycle assessment, control, and reduction indicators of Global Warming Potential, Land use impact, and Total Primary Energy, it has the greatest impact on improving the sustainable performance of a construction project. We also examined the interaction between the most effective building information modeling criteria and life cycle evaluation using the Delphi method. This approach improved project sustainability performance by reducing time, cost, resource consumption, and environmental impacts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; interaction; life cycle assessment; project success; structural equation model |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, environmental impact, effectiveness, structural equation model, construction project, coordination, resource consumption, interaction, construction industry, primary energy, project success, environmental performance, building information modelling, Delphi method, land use, sustainability performance, global warming, survey, life cycle assessment, structural equation modelling, life cycle |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, production management, performance management, management, sustainability assessment, statistical analysis, information systems, behavioral psychology, industry analysis, value management, climate science, environmental impact, data collection methods, energy systems, real estate economics, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here