Public clients ability to drive industry change: The case of implementing BIM

Lindblad, H and Karrbom Gustavsson, T (2021) Public clients ability to drive industry change: The case of implementing BIM. Construction Management and Economics, 39(1), pp. 21-35. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Public clients are proposed as key actors in driving construction industry change towards a more sustainable, efficient and productive industry. Based on how they procure consultants and contractors, it is argued that public clients have the power and are in the position to act as “innovation supporters” and “change agents.” However, the client’s role as a driver of change and innovation is oversimplified and there is a need for further investigation into the client’s ability to drive industry change. This paper presents a case study of a public client’s initiative to drive industry change through the implementation of Building Information Modelling (BIM). We do this by investigating the process of intra-organisational change at the public client by mapping the client’s absorptive capacity for change. The case study shows difficulties in turning the external knowledge into actual transformation when implementing a systemic innovation such as BIM. Findings contribute to the literature on public clients as drivers of change and innovation in construction and are relevant to research on public clients as drivers for industry change and innovation and to research on BIM as a game changer.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: absorptive capacity; building information modelling; client; industry change; innovation; procurement; project manager
Index terms: organizational change, absorptive capacity, mapping, agent, building information modelling, case study, project manager, transformation, investigation, systemic innovation, implementation, construction industry, public client
Subjects: contractual arrangements, business, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, sociology, information systems, industry analysis, spatial and geospatial analysis, theoretical framing, management
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here