Loosemore, M; Osborne, J and Higgon, D (2021) Affective, cognitive, behavioural and situational outcomes of social procurement: A case study of social value creation in a major facilities management firm. Construction Management and Economics, 39(3), pp. 227-244. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
While there is an emerging body of research on social procurement in construction, there is little empirical research from a facilities management perspective. This is despite the enormous untapped potential of the facilities management sector to create social value in the communities in which they operate. To address this gap in research, this paper presents an in-depth case study of an innovative social procurement initiative developed by a major Australian facilities management organisation. Integrating research in the fields of employment studies, facilities management and social value, it provides new empirical evidence of the significant affective, cognitive, behavioural and situational social value outcomes which can be generated through facilities management. These are best achieved through new hybrid partnerships between business, government, not-for-profit, community and educational organisations which create shared value, underpinned by a common interest in maximising social value for the communities involved. More research is needed into the types of attributes, skills and resources that facilitate such outcomes, the attributes of organisations most likely to be able to collaborate and the types of cross-sector partnerships which work.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; corporate social responsibility; facilities management; social impact; social procurement; social value |
| Index terms: | profit, shared value, facilities management, evidence, employment, partnership, case study, corporate social responsibility, social impact, built environment, social value |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, equitable outcomes, economic analysis, management, health safety and environment, partnership management, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Value Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here