Rodríguez-Labajos, L; Thomson, C S and O’Brien, G (2021) Applying constructivist grounded theory in co-production research: A case study exploring its potential and lessons for construction management research. Construction Management and Economics, 39(5), pp. 369-382. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The last decade has seen a drive within construction management (CM) research for greater collaboration between academia and practice to improve the impact and relevance of research. Co-production, where academics and practitioners are engaged in framing the research problem, theory building, research design and problem solving, provides potential for engaged research which achieves mutual benefits in terms of theory and practice outcomes. To benefit from this trend, CM researchers require to revisit their established approaches. Under explored in CM research, this study identifies the potential of applying constructivist grounded theory (CGT) as an approach that enhance co-production research. The paper provides reflexive accounts of what makes CGT a suitable approach for co-production and presents a synthesis of its application in practice, reflecting on its strengths and weaknesses in the context of co-production. The applicability of the approach is illustrated through a case study on facilities performance measurement in the NHS. CGT contributed in the questioning of the scope and underlying assumptions leading to co-produced research which provided theoretical insight which underpinned guidance for future development by NHS Scotland. The findings indicate that CGT is a well-established, rigorous and reliable approach that is viable for conducting co-production research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | co-production; collaboration; construction management; constructivist grounded theory; performance measurement |
| Index terms: | management research, framing, theory building, practitioner, problem solving, co-production, collaboration, case study, performance measurement, research design, grounded theory, academia, Scotland |
| Subjects: | Geography, management, theoretical framing, performance measurement, decision-making and reasoning, educational institutions, innovation studies, practitioner, data collection methods, research design and methodology, data science, conceptual models |
| Topics: | Education, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here