Wang, R; Lu, W and Wei, Y (2021) Owners' use of contract-based power in construction project transactions: Restrictions from process specificity and uncertainty. Construction Management and Economics, 39(2), pp. 117-132. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Little is known about what restrictions make owners unable to use or give up using contract-based power in construction project transactions. To examine this issue, this research explores the effects of process specificity on owners' contract design and power use during contract execution as well as the moderating role of uncertainty in these effects using empirical data from 327 construction project transactions in China. The results show that owners can use coercive and legitimate powers based on contractual control while using reward and legitimate powers based on contractual coordination. The increase in process specificity (a special version of asset specificity in construction project transactions) encourages owners to intensify ex ante contract design while restricting their ex post coercive power use based on contractual control. Behavioural uncertainty weakens owners' tendency to intensify contractual control with increasing process specificity, restricting their contractual-control-based power use. However, task uncertainty strengthens (rather than restricts) owners' tendency to intensify contract design and power use when process specificity increases. These findings can help practitioners understand how the attributes of construction project transactions are related to transaction costs to affect owners' contract-based power use, thereby avoiding ineffective power use.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset specificity; contract; power; transaction cost economics; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | China, owner, coordination, practitioner, asset specificity, construction project, transaction cost |
| Subjects: | management, Geography, production management, economic concepts, sociology, financial analysis, practitioner |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here