Andersson, R and Buser, M (2022) From waste to resource management? Construction and demolition waste management through the lens of institutional work. Construction Management and Economics, 40(6), pp. 477-496. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The European Union has issued action plans to reduce the production of construction waste and increase the reuse and recycling of materials in the hope of triggering a rapid transition towards a Circular Economy (CE). The management of construction and demolition waste, however, struggles to apply these measures. Our purpose, therefore, is to analyse how different actors involved in the management of waste could contribute to transform existing practices so that they respond to the shifting demands of legislation and support CE. To understand how this transformation work is performed, we build on the concept of institutional work, which enables us to describe how actors, rather than accepting institutions as permanent and immovable, contribute to their development by creating, maintaining or disrupting the existing institution. Drawing on qualitative research methods, we collected empirical data through 31 semi-structured interviews, observations of meetings and site visits. Our results show that whereas the production of waste is somewhat reduced, and the sorting of fractions improved, the institutional work performed is not sufficient to translate sustainability into new economic values. Although the work performed legitimizes CE principles and enables new initiatives, it mostly fails to change normative associations and to define new rules of action that support CE.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; construction and demolition waste; institutional field; institutional work; sustainable agenda |
| Index terms: | European Union, drawing, recycling, interview, legislation, resource management, circular economy, construction waste, waste management, transformation, qualitative research method, construction and demolition, institutional work |
| Subjects: | sustainable design, waste management, business, control systems, data collection methods, research design and methodology, physical geography and landforms, technical documentation, legal systems, sociology |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Project Management, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here