Transforming construction: Heterarchical megaproject ecologies and the management of innovation

Brunet, M and Cohendet, P (2022) Transforming construction: Heterarchical megaproject ecologies and the management of innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 40(11-12), pp. 973-986. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

As the digital transformation impacts many sectors of the economy, actors in the construction industry—and more specifically in megaproject initiatives—have to adapt to new technologies and processes. Megaprojects are commonly undertaken to build essential infrastructures such as roads, dams, buildings, or even smart cities or districts, and usually involve complex and hybrid organizational forms. Moreover, digitalization transforms megaprojects, presenting megaproject teams with opportunities, but also challenges. This conceptual paper explores the characteristics of heterarchical megaproject ecologies in order to identify ways to address the impacts of the current digital transformation. Our aim is to analyze how a heterarchical form of governance contributes to transforming the management of innovation. While heterarchies can lead to severe dysfunctions, we propose strategies to manage them, paying specific attention to the governance of a common-pool-resource scenario, network roles, knowledge articulation and learning. The main contribution of this paper is to provide a renewed conceptualization of megaproject governance and to propose a conceptual framework that can be used to study the management of innovation in empirical megaproject settings.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: digitalisation; heterarchy; management of innovation; megaproject ecologies; megaproject governance
Index terms: construction industry, smart city, ecology, transformation, new technology, governance, conceptual framework, megaproject, strategy, digitalization
Subjects: management, theoretical framing, industry analysis, business, urban sustainability, digital technology, innovation and technology management, environmental science, strategic project management
Topics: Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Governance
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here