Construction logistics in a multi-project context: Coopetition among main contractors and the role of third-party logistics providers

Ekeskär, A; Havenvid, M I; Karrbom Gustavsson, T and Eriksson, P E (2022) Construction logistics in a multi-project context: Coopetition among main contractors and the role of third-party logistics providers. Construction Management and Economics, 40(1), pp. 25-40. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

As a part of supply chain management (SCM) initiatives to improve performance and productivity in construction projects, the use of construction logistics setups (CLSs) operated by third-party logistics (TPL) providers have increased. CLSs are often used in complex multi-project contexts, such as urban development districts, where extensive coordination of actors, resources, and activities is needed. The purpose of this paper is twofold: to investigate how main contractors engage in horizontal relationships with each other when coordinating activities and resources within and across projects in a multi-project context, and to investigate what role a TPL provider assumes when engaging in relationships with main contractors in a multi-project context. The findings are based on a case study of an urban development district with a mandatory TPL-operated CLS, and we apply the industrial network approach. In this multi-project context, the main contractors engage in coopetitive relationships, coordinating activities and resources within and across projects. The TPL provider coordinates actors, resources, and activities, facilitating smoother production by managing logistics and mediating coopetitive relationships. This can be understood as a multi-project coordination role and extends the role SCM can play in construction. In that role, a TPL provider can minimise tensions between coopetitive actors across a multitude of horizontal relationships and projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: coopetition; industrial network approach; multi-project; supply chain management; third-party logistics
Index terms: productivity, urban development, third-party logistic, construction project, main contractor, construction logistics, case study, coordination
Subjects: management, production management, urban design, data collection methods, supplier oversight, construction logistics, practitioner
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here