A decade of lessons learned: Deployment of lean at a large general contractor

Elfving, J A (2022) A decade of lessons learned: Deployment of lean at a large general contractor. Construction Management and Economics, 40(7-8), pp. 548-561. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe lean experiments from a period that lasted over a decade. The aim is to provide insights for both industry practitioners and academics concerning what worked and what did not work and to discuss barriers to avoid when taking academic concepts to industry. What makes this paper unique is that we are following the developments inside one company, Skanska Finland, uninterrupted for over a decade. Dr Glenn Ballard was closely involved in the developments and deployments throughout the journey. The paper confirms earlier findings of managing variability prior to other process improvements. At the same time, it is important to understand the minimum organisational level needed when developing and deploying lean methods. During our journey, the most successful deployment was the Last Planner System®; it has been both robust against market turns but also it has been possible to deploy it project-by-project. Thus, there is no need to wait until the whole company or a large part of it has understood the concept before deployment can start. Supplier development requires a wider scope than just a single project or the duration of a project for successful deployment. The weak or less sustainable deployment of logistics solutions in the construction industry may be because it requires industry-level technology standardisation and data platforms.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; implementation; last planner system<sup>®</sup>; supply chain management
Index terms: general contractor, experiment, process improvement, lessons learned, last planner system, practitioner, Finland, platform, implementation, construction industry, duration, variability, standardization
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, Geography, digital design, professional development, performance measurement, management, industry analysis, statistical analysis, project controls
Topics: Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Time Control, Digital Applications, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here