Hoang, V N; Raharjo, J P and Susilawati, C (2022) Meta-frontier efficiency analysis of real estate and construction firms in Indonesia. Construction Management and Economics, 40(10), pp. 770-780. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Improving the productive efficiency (also called technical efficiency) of real estate and construction firms (RECFs) is essential to tackle the sustained shortage of housing supply and the increasing unaffordability of housing in developing countries. However, there are few studies that focus on this issue in the context of developing countries; and available literature focuses mainly on firms listed on stock markets. Our study employs the meta-frontier framework to measure the efficiency of 832 small, medium, and large RECFs across Indonesia from 2012 to 2016, using a data envelopment analysis technique. The meta-frontier framework allows for different production technologies and different business environments operated by firms of different sizes. Under the specification of group-specific production frontiers, large firms obtain the highest average efficiency scores (0.694), followed by medium firms (0.529), and small firms (0.479). The technology gaps between the meta-frontier and the group-frontiers for small and medium firms are relatively large, suggesting that the overall industry would be able to achieve remarkable efficiency improvement if firms could access technologies used by more efficient firms. Our results also show that determinants of the efficiency vary across firm groups, suggesting that policy and managerial interventions tailored to each group would have more impact on the overall productive efficiency of the entire industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction firms; production frontiers; productive efficiency; real estate firms |
| Index terms: | Indonesia, efficiency, determinant, data envelopment analysis, markets, real estate, construction firm, developing country, specification, housing |
| Subjects: | performance management, Geography, contractual condition, development economics, construction type, risk assessment, organization, real estate economics, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Urban Studies, International Construction, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here