Hu, M; Nippala, E; Kallioharju, K and Pelsmakers, S (2022) Monte Carlo simulation approach to understand the cost variance for energy retrofit projects: Comparative study of Finland and the United States. Construction Management and Economics, 40(3), pp. 207-222. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Energy-efficient building is often characterised with higher construction costs. There is a large variance in energy-efficient building construction costs, especially in retrofit projects. A lack of understanding of cost variance and ambiguity of cost-optimal practices has impeded the adoption of energy retrofit practices globally. To respond to such a knowledge gap, a comparative study was conducted on energy retrofit projects on residential buildings in Finland and the United States. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine the coefficient of variation for construction costs and the potential reasons behind the variations. The specific aims of this study are (a) to gain a deeper understanding of construction cost variances in energy retrofit projects, (b) to identify the most influential cost items, and (c) to understand the correlations among different cost items. For this analysis, a database including 10 Finnish buildings and 7 US buildings was created, and actual construction cost data was collected. The results showed the following: (1) US projects had a larger total construction cost variance with highly skewed distribution, and Finnish energy retrofit projects had a cost distribution similar to conventional retrofit projects; (2) the two most significant construction cost factors for both countries were non-energy related cost items and the building envelope, rather than the mechanical system (heating and ventilation) as commonly perceived; and (3) the larger construction cost variance in the United States may be associated with the unfamiliarity of energy-efficient technologies and varied construction methods in different regions. The insights and suggestions derived from those findings are discussed in the conclusion.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction cost; cost; Finland; Monte Carlo simulation; renovation |
| Index terms: | database, comparative study, energy-efficient building, residential building, renovation, Monte Carlo simulation, ventilation, construction cost, building envelope, United States, mechanical system, variation, cost variance, Finland, construction method, variance |
| Subjects: | building construction, construction type, Geography, sustainable design, contractual condition, measurement and scaling, financial analysis, research design and methodology, modelling and simulation, data management, renovation and retrofit, air quality, architectural elements, financial and cost management, mechanical systems |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Geographical Context, Contract Administration, Site Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here