Lohne, J; Torp, O; Andersen, B; Aslesen, S; Bygballe, L; Bølviken, T; Drevland, F; Engebø, A; Fosse, R; Holm, H T; Hunn, L K; Kalsaas, B T; Klakegg, O J; Knotten, V; Kristensen, K H; Olsson, N O E; Rolstadås, A; Skaar, J; Svalestuen, F; Vaagen, H; Wondimu, P and Laedre, O (2022) The emergence of lean construction in the Norwegian AEC industry. Construction Management and Economics, 40(7-8), pp. 585-597. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Lean construction has inspired the AEC industry globally over the last decades, and this manifests within a wide array of contexts. The purpose of this paper is to provide a narrative-based qualitative analysis of the emergence and impact of Lean construction on a national level, notably in the Norwegian AEC industry. The analysis is based on the concept of paradigm shift and on empirical knowledge in the form of narratives. The narratives of practitioners and researchers provide deep insights into how Lean Construction has inspired the Norwegian AEC industry and academia, respectively. The reflections indicate that the introduction of the Lean construction principles and tools in the Norwegian AEC industry has depended on promoters who have been convinced about its advantages. The role of active promoters–in particular Dr. Glenn Ballard–is underlined as key to successful introduction of Lean Construction. Key cultural features of the Norwegian AEC industry are emphasized as important success factors. Lean Construction in Norway needs to be understood as a phenomenon occurring within a setting that is generally advantageous but also following an effort carried out on several levels. Key elements that can be used within other contexts are (1) the existence of promoters, (2) cooperation between industry and academic circles, (3) a high degree of trust and (4) a predominance of bottom-up organizations within the industry with few levels of hierarchy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | lean construction; lean production; narrative analysis; paradigm shift; systemic change |
| Index terms: | lean construction, success factor, Norway, lean production, narrative, practitioner, qualitative analysis, cooperation, promoter, emergence, paradigm, reflection, academia |
| Subjects: | psychology, health monitoring assessment and metrics, research design and methodology, practitioner, sociology, educational institutions, building construction, systems engineering, manufacturing engineering, education and knowledge transfer, professional development, Geography, qualitative and interpretive research |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Education, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here