Qin, B and Green, S D (2022) The micro-practices of project organizing in the Chinese construction sector: A sensemaking perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 40(9), pp. 655-675. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The organization of construction in the People’s Republic of China has over recent decades undergone radical restructuring. The announcement of Deng Xiaoping’s Open Door strategy in 1978 marked the beginning of the transition towards the espoused socialist market economy and the progressive introduction of market mechanisms. Existing research tends to focus on the derivation of “critical success factors” rather than the lived realities of those directly involved. In contrast, the current paper adopts a sensemaking perspective that privileges the transient roles and identities of those involved in the micro-processes of project organizing. The empirical focus lies on the sensemaking narratives of middle managers within three state-owned construction enterprises in the Chongqing city region. The findings illustrate how market mechanisms such as bidding and tendering play out in complex ways involving hybrid arrangements between new and pre-existing ways of working. The terminology of project management is seen to have played a performative role in establishing the “project” as the essential unit around which the socialist market is organized. Middle managers are further found to maintain multiple identities in response to the experienced paradoxes of the socialist market economy. The research provides new insights into the micro-processes of project organizing in China with broader implications for transitional economies elsewhere.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | China; marketization; practice; sensemaking; transitional economies |
| Index terms: | sensemaking, manager, state-owned construction enterprise, strategy, narrative, bidding, paradox, construction sector, critical success factor, China, market mechanisms, identity, privilege, project management |
| Subjects: | government bodies, practitioner, control systems, social theory and frameworks, bidding, economic analysis, management, qualitative and interpretive research, Geography, project management theory and practice, cognitive psychology, sociology, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Ethics, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Procurement, Governance, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here