Profitability in construction: How does building renovation business fare compared to new building business

Rajala, P; Ylä-Kujala, A; Sinkkonen, T and Kärri, T (2022) Profitability in construction: How does building renovation business fare compared to new building business. Construction Management and Economics, 40(3), pp. 223-237. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

In recent decades, energy-efficiency improvements and ageing dwelling stocks have grown the renovation need in many countries. This research compares the profitability of building renovation companies and companies specializing in new construction using financial statement analysis and analysis of variance. Profitability is assessed through EBITDA and return on assets (ROA). Debt to equity (D/E) ratio as a solvency measure supports the analysis. The findings show micro and small companies in the new building sector have a statistically significant advantage in EBITDA over renovation in same size groups; projects in the renovation sector appear to be more complex, especially in terms of design, causing cost overruns. The more cyclical nature of new construction, however, equalizes EBITDA differences over time. Medium-size companies overall had the lowest EBITDA following the 2008–2009 financial crisis. ROA was generally higher for the renovation sector highlighting the more capital-intensive nature of new construction; unsold apartments and land for future projects hold capital, which results in higher D/E ratios. D/E ratios also revealed that both sectors have faced the COVID-19 pandemic less indebted compared to the 2008–2009 financial crisis. Since both sectors' profitability has been decreasing during the research period (2005–2019), actions are needed especially in the renovation sector, which has an increasingly important role in developed societies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building renovation business; construction industry; new building business; profitability; solvency
Index terms: COVID-19, society, building renovation, cost overrun, variance, efficiency, pandemic, return on assets, construction industry, land, renovation, profitability
Subjects: asset management, measurement and scaling, industry analysis, communities and social development, performance management, renovation and retrofit, health risk and incident analysis, real estate economics, economic analysis, financial and cost management
Topics: Urban Studies, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here