Svensson, I and Gluch, P (2022) Materiality in action: The role of objects in institutional work. Construction Management and Economics, 40(1), pp. 41-55. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Public property owners currently face a great backlog of renovation work at the same time as there is a need to build new, increase cost-efficiency, and comply with new environmental regulations on energy efficiency. To manage these challenges many public property owners have initiated change processes to develop new strategic ways of working with their properties, often aligned with a project portfolio approach. This involves a quite radical shift of practices in these organizations, which requires individuals to engage in institutional work. Recent studies have highlighted how institutional work is shared between humans and objects. To increase understanding of objects' role in institutional work through which public property owners develop new practices that support a holistic, long-term, and sustainable property management, we analyzed observational data of strategy project meetings in three Swedish public property owner organizations. Findings show how objects have an active role in institutional work through acts of attacking, justifying, and/or safeguarding to maintain, create and/or disrupt institutions. Objects take on multiple roles and both unite and divide human actors as well as evoke emotions that guide actions. Three types of agency are highlighted: relational, discursive, and emotional. Increased knowledge on the role of objects in institutional work and how objects (can) influence human agency assists actors in making better-informed decisions in strategic change processes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | institutional work; materiality; public organizations; renovation |
| Index terms: | face, efficiency, property owner, renovation, environmental regulation, materiality, institutional work, agency, energy efficiency, strategy, property management |
| Subjects: | renovation and retrofit, sociology, psychology, real estate economics, sustainability and energy, health safety and environment, performance management, management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here