El-Dabaa, R and Abdelmohsen, S (2023) Integrating performance indicators in the production rules of shape-shifting grammars for architectural adaptive façade systems. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(4), pp. 419-437. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
This paper presents shape-shifting grammar as a computational method that couples the environmental impact of utilizing programable materials in adaptive façades by their design parameters. The proposed grammar relies on physical experiments in a sealed temperature chamber, associated with a digital interface and image analysis software to track motion response for our previously developed composite 'Hygromorphic Thermo-bimetal (HMTM)' that responds passively to variation in humidity or temperature. This is linked with Grasshopper to evaluate performance indicators, specifically environmental impact, and percentage of view.The significance of the proposed grammar lies in tracking, analyzing, and predicting the behavior of the programable composite, therefore allowing for an efficient process using programable materials in adaptive façade design without the need for exhaustive physical experimentation and digital simulations. The developed grammar identifies production rules that map embedded and controlled parameters of the composite configuration to a desired deflection and motion response along with its environmental impact.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | hygroscopic design; performance indicators; programable materials; shape-shifting grammars; thermo-bimetals |
| Index terms: | humidity, environmental impact, variation, configuration, experiment, performance indicator, composite, design parameter |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, systems engineering, materials science, design constraints, environmental impact, climate science, contractual condition, performance management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Quality Management, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here