Borg, N; Scott-Young, C M; Naderpajouh, N and Borg, J (2023) Surviving adversity: Personal and career resilience in the AEC industry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Construction Management and Economics, 41(5), pp. 361-378. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the personal and career resilience of project management practitioners working in the Architectural, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industries and their organizational support in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The global pandemic offered a unique opportunity to explore resilience both as a state (using quantitative scales) and as a process (using qualitative responses) in the context of a shared transboundary disturbance in normal routines. A mixed methods approach was used to triangulate quantitative and qualitative data from an online survey which included established scales and open-ended questions. Informed by a total of 121 valid survey responses, hierarchical regression analysis of the scales provided insights into the relationship between career and personal resilience and how personal resilience contributed to greater career resilience and the ability to positively adapt to the pandemic’s consequences. The quantitative analysis was complemented by a thematic analysis of the open-ended responses to identify the forms of organizational support that were important for resilience building during the pandemic. Organizational resources, such as training, mentoring, increased communication, and greater management support fostered employee adaptation to the pandemic shock. Evidence-based recommendations are made for AEC organizations to facilitate better workforce preparation for future adversities through providing effective resilience-promoting support mechanisms. The findings add to the body of knowledge by providing a better understanding of the importance of personal and career resilience and the role of organizational support in the process of resilience-building during adversities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | career resilience; COVID-19 pandemic; organizational support; personal resilience; project management; shocks and stressors |
| Index terms: | routine, COVID-19, stressors, survey, thematic analysis, practitioner, evidence, career, mentoring, body of knowledge, quantitative analysis, support mechanism, mixed method, pandemic, adaptation, regression analysis, project management |
| Subjects: | training, knowledge management, data analysis and analytics, organization, user focus, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, health conditions and diseases, sociology, statistical analysis, health risk and incident analysis, professional development, project management theory and practice, methods and analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here