Dallasega, P; Schulze, F and Revolti, A (2023) Augmented reality to overcome visual management implementation barriers in construction: A mep case study. Construction Management and Economics, 41(3), pp. 232-255. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Visual Management (VM) is an important Lean method to enhance information flow and reduce waste in construction. However, its adoption is hindered by several barriers. Scientific works mention that emerging technologies can support or replace conventional VM practices, but empirical evidence is missing. Based on an in-depth literature review, we derived the research questions (RQs), arguing if Augmented Reality (AR) could mitigate VM implementation barriers. Thus, a corresponding AR measurement model was developed. Through a case study of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) installations in a multi-story apartment building, the RQs were answered using an AR head-mounted display (HMD). To gather the necessary empirical evidence, the data was collected through direct observations on-site and through semi-structured interviews. The study findings show that (1) AR provided time savings and generally satisfactory accuracy levels. (2) AR demonstrably reduced the training effort to better support MEP marking work. (3) The use of AR reduced the resistance to change to adopt VM practices, although concerns were raised about poor ergonomics and work safety risks. Future research activities should consist of investigating the potential of other emerging technologies to overcome the common Lean implementation barriers in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | augmented reality; barriers; kpis; lean construction; mep; visual management |
| Index terms: | emerging technology, literature review, apartment building, evidence, interview, information flow, plumbing, direct observation, accuracy, lean construction, implementation, ergonomics, visual management, case study, augmented reality, time saving |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, visualization, management, information systems, professional development, mechanical systems, building construction, data analysis and analytics, innovation and technology management, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, occupational health and safety management, construction type, time analysis |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Research Practice, Site Management, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Time Control, Business Strategy, Information Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here