What's it going to take? Lessons learned from COVID-19 and worker mental health in the Australian construction industry

Dickson, R (2023) What's it going to take? Lessons learned from COVID-19 and worker mental health in the Australian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 41(9), pp. 758-780. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

In Australia, rates of suicide and poor mental health among construction workers were high before the COVID-19 pandemic. “Lock downs”, “restrictions”, “social distancing” and legislative changes responding to the pandemic have likely exacerbated the working conditions that foster poor mental health. This study analyses the way in which workplace health and safety (WHS) is regulated in Australia against the backdrop of existing research relating to the development of Australia’s WHS laws, and the state of mental health of those working in Australia’s construction industry. This study was conducted using a doctrinal research methodology and utilising legal theory. This study assesses the capacity of the Australian WHS regulatory system to protect construction workers' mental health by examining and interpreting key provisions in Australia’s WHS laws. It then uses a regulatory theory, responsive regulation, to explain the inconsistency between the capacity of those laws to safeguard mental health and the very poor state of mental health of Australia’s construction workers. The conclusion reached is that there is scope to improve current WHS laws to better protect construction workers' mental health. A recommendation is made, that current WHS laws are changed to prescribe minimum standards of worker mental health, and mandate control measures to minimise and/or eliminate psychosocial risks. It is submitted that these changes in the law will contribute to a changed culture in Australia’s construction sector, which is supportive of mentally healthy workplaces and workers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; COVID-19; health and safety; mental health; regulation
Index terms: health and safety, regulatory system, COVID-19, mandate, regulation, social distancing, lock down, lessons learned, construction sector, pandemic, Australia, research methodology, suicide, mental health, construction industry, working conditions, construction worker
Subjects: health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, political science, environmental health, health risk and incident analysis, health safety and environment, Geography, employment law, professional development, public policy, research design and methodology, practitioner
Topics: Sustainability, Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Health and Safety, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here