Giahchy, S; Hosseini, S A; Akhbari, M; Safa, E and Akbarpour, A (2023) A novel mathematical multi-criteria decision-making model for optimizing life cycle energy and cost in construction projects planning. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(2), pp. 200-213. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Today, energy management systems are usually assessed as key to sustainable development goals. One of the best criteria for energy management systems in construction projects is Life Cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA). This research is a quantitative-qualitative study based on a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model. This research involves four stages: library study, statistical survey, descriptive study, and case study. The review of previous studies showed that the LCEA and MCDM alone could not provide a comprehensive energy consumption management assessment model, due to inherent uncertainty and the existence of various analysis parameters; however, when are used in an integrated framework; the LCEA & MCDM hybrid approach serves as the best instruments to assess energy management systems. This research has proposed a newly developed hybrid multi-objective mathematical decision-making model to select appropriate and optimum options for all building shell components to optimize and manage the Cost and Energy of the Building Life Cycle. The life cycle energy analysis of an educational building in a case study showed that optimization using the proposed model saves about 16% of energy during the lifetime of the building. In addition, the investment payback period for this optimization is less than seven months in the first year of operation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; energy efficiency; energy-saving; life cycle energy; multi-criteria decision-making |
| Index terms: | educational building, multi-criteria decision-making, case study, energy efficiency, survey, qualitative study, building life cycle, sustainable development goal, payback, energy-saving, construction project, energy consumption, decision-making, option, energy management system, construction industry, life cycle energy |
| Subjects: | asset management, decision analysis, industry analysis, production management, sustainable design, sustainability and energy, energy systems, economic analysis, data collection methods, construction type, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here