Gujar, S and Deshmukh, A (2023) Methodology for visual comfort analysis in intermediate open spaces of residential areas, case study: Nagpur, India. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(6), pp. 602-619. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Researchers often use daylight and glare analysis to measure visual comfort for daytime inside a built space. However, residential environments include both built and unbuilt spaces. Recently, unbuilt open spaces like courts are gaining equal importance in architectural designs. The literature review revealed very little research on visual comfort analysis in these intermediate open spaces. Therefore, this study proposes a method to analyze visual comfort in identified intermediate open-to-sky courts of clustered residential development. First, by conducting the point-in-time analysis, the study compares field measurements against simulation results to validate the software’s ability to simulate accurate daylight and glare values in these courts. Later, the study analyses visual comfort in identified courts by conducting an annual glare analysis using the calibrated simulation model. The outcome confirms the use of annual and point-in-time glare analysis for visual comfort analysis in courts of residential areas. The results exhibited visually uncomfortable views at the corresponding time. Additionally, simulation experiments highlight the importance of such spaces' shape, size, and orientation in visual comfort analysis. These outcomes will help future visual comfort research of intermediate open spaces in low to mid-rise residential environments with tropical climatic conditions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | annual glare analysis; daylight; discomfort glare; residential open spaces; unbuilt spaces; visual comfort |
| Index terms: | field-measurement, discomfort, literature review, simulation experiment, case study, climatic condition, architectural design, residential development, India, visual comfort, glare, open space, residential area, methodology |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, zoning, climate science, modelling and simulation, data analysis and analytics, design practice, health risk and incident analysis, economic development, research methods, Geography, urban design, building performance, environmental engineering |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here