Liu, Q; Feng, Y; London, K and Zhang, P (2023) Coping strategies for work and cultural stressors in multicultural construction workplaces: A study in Australia. Construction Management and Economics, 41(7), pp. 537-553. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Existing coping theories typically position coping as a reactive approach to managing mental health. Intercultural coping was proposed to positively deal with stressors and alleviate the negative impacts of stressors on mental health outcomes in multicultural workplaces. This study aims to investigate the role of intercultural coping strategies in influencing the relationships between stressors and mental health outcomes in multicultural construction workplaces. Data were collected from 252 construction workers in Australia using online questionnaire survey. Data were analysed using the structural equation modelling (SEM) technique. The results revealed the moderating effect of positive coping strategies on the stressor-psychological outcome relationship. A worker who is open to cultural dissimilarity tends to suffer less the adverse effect of cultural stressors on mental health. A worker with cognitive complexity is less susceptible to the adverse impact of work stressors on mental health. Whereas, a worker who is performance-oriented is more vulnerable to the impact of work stressors on mental health. This study may contribute to the existing body of work by uncovering the moderating role of positive coping strategies and providing targeted and effective coping strategies in multicultural construction workplaces.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction workers; coping strategies; mental health; multicultural workplace; stressors |
| Index terms: | Australia, construction worker, mental health, coping, strategy, structural equation modelling, survey, stressors, complexity, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, systems engineering, statistical analysis, behavioral psychology, health conditions and diseases, Geography, management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here