Michieka, N M; Razek, N H A and Gearhart, R S (2023) Modelling the impact of oil price changes and investment decisions on construction wages in the U.S. Construction Management and Economics, 41(6), pp. 500-518. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The U.S. construction industry has been known to employ workers without a college education and provide adequate compensation make ends meet. Today, job quality in the industry has deteriorated to a level where wages are too low, causing workers to rely on U.S. safety net programs. This may be exacerbated by oil price changes, especially in regions where the oil industry is a significant driver of the economy. In this paper, we investigate the effects of oil price dynamics on real wages in the construction industry. A non-linear ARDL and TAR model are used for the empirical exercise which focusses on six top oil producing counties in the U.S. Long-run findings indicate that a 10% increase in oil price increases construction wages by 1.4, 1.2 and 9.3% in Kern, Weld and McKenzie Counties, respectively. Short run estimates indicate that a positive shock to oil prices increases wages in McKenzie County, North Dakota. Results from the TAR model show that the impact of an expansionary monetary policy to increase investment–and accordingly, increase wages–is diluted when oil prices are below the low oil price threshold.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction wages; investment decisions; oil prices; regional economics; threshold |
| Index terms: | regional economic, wages, program, exercise, estimate, modelling, construction industry, compensation, investment decision, dynamics |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, industry analysis, business economics, software systems, economic analysis, financial and cost management, analytical methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here