National culture and occupational safety: A comparison of worker-level factors impacting safety for Danish and Swedish construction workers

Nielsen, K J; Törner, M; Pousette, A and Grill, M (2023) National culture and occupational safety: A comparison of worker-level factors impacting safety for Danish and Swedish construction workers. Construction Management and Economics, 41(6), pp. 445-456. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Denmark and Sweden are societally and regulatory similar countries with large differences in occupational injury rates. Denmark has consistently had twice the rate of reported injuries compared to Sweden and a 45% higher rate of fatal injuries in the construction industry. The current study aims to further investigate the perceived underlying factors responsible for the difference in injury rate between Denmark and Sweden by examining the possible impact on safety climate and safety behaviour of cooperation, perceived organizational support, organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), planning, safety motivation, and long-term orientation. The paper is based on a questionnaire study completed by 346 construction workers from 48 Swedish construction sites and 465 construction workers from 37 Danish construction sites. The results show that all six predictors were positively related with safety climate and/or safety behaviour in both countries. However, the level of the predictors was generally higher in Sweden, and there was a stronger positive relationship with the outcomes in Sweden than Denmark. Specifically, the valuation of cooperation and OCB, planning and long-term orientation were more dominant in Sweden. These differences illuminate some of the possible factors underlying the difference in injury rate between the Danish and Swedish construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: national culture; national differences; planning; safety climate
Index terms: construction worker, construction industry, occupational safety, national culture, safety behaviour, Sweden, Denmark, cooperation, questionnaire, motivation, construction site, injury, safety climate
Subjects: work location, psychology, practitioner, data collection methods, industry analysis, cross-cultural studies, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, Geography, health safety and environment
Topics: Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Site Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here