Engineered and emerged collaboration: Vicious and virtuous cycles

Nilsson Vestola, E and Eriksson, P E (2023) Engineered and emerged collaboration: Vicious and virtuous cycles. Construction Management and Economics, 41(1), pp. 79-96. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Inter-organizational collaboration within the construction industry consists of both engineered and emerged aspects. Engineered formal practices and emerged informal practices interplay in their influence on the overall success of client-contractor collaboration. This interplay has been recognized but is still understudied and requires further research to increase the understanding of how the interplay functions. To enable the study of the emerged aspects of collaboration we applied a practice-based approach in a longitudinal multiple case study, including four projects for operation and maintenance of road infrastructure. This paper contributes to the literature on collaboration in construction by providing detailed examples of how the interplay between engineered and emerged collaboration may unfold, showing how formal and informal practices contribute to the development of vicious and virtuous cycles of collaboration. Furthermore, our findings indicate that a virtuous cycle of only informal practices can become a weakness if unexpected problems occur. Project managers should therefore be encouraged to implement formal collaboration, even if the project team is already in a virtuous cycle of informal collaboration.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: collaboration; operation and maintenance; partnering; practice-based approach
Index terms: operation and maintenance, collaboration, case study, project manager, partnering, project team, construction industry
Subjects: management, maintenance engineering, industry analysis, partnership management, data collection methods, profession, project delivery
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here