Vosman, L; Coenen, T B J; Volker, L and Visscher, K (2023) Collaboration and innovation beyond project boundaries: Exploring the potential of an ecosystem perspective in the infrastructure sector. Construction Management and Economics, 41(6), pp. 457-474. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Current societal challenges demand enduring engagement and the implementation of innovations. Unfortunately, the project-based nature of the construction industry fails to offer suitable conditions for innovation and change in terms of building long-term relationships and aligning incentives beyond the project scope. In this paper, we explore the potential of an innovation ecosystem perspective to reach sector-wide goals related to societal challenges in the infrastructure sector. Accordingly, five Dutch infrastructure cases were studied in terms of four characteristics: (1) actor heterogeneity; (2) strategic alignment of actors; (3) alignment with respect to a value proposition; and (4) governance structure. We found that the innovation ecosystem perspective has the potential to contribute to innovation in the sector, especially when specific innovations or knowledge building are pursued. In particular, the long-term perspective to collaboration in relation to addressing societal challenges and the shift to more relational ways of governance were found promising avenues for incorporation in the industry. The innovation ecosystem perspective in infrastructure, however, also poses substantial organizational, cultural, and processual challenges, such as adopting novel practices with respect to collaboration and establishing continuing informal relationships beyond the public procurement context.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | industry change; infrastructure sector; innovation ecosystem; interorganizational relationships; project-transcending innovation |
| Index terms: | construction industry, implementation, interorganizational relationship, project scope, governance, infrastructure sector, boundaries, collaboration |
| Subjects: | scope management, business, contractual arrangements, property law, management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Procurement, Governance, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here