Optimal equity structure of PPP projects when private-sector shareholders' "investor-contractor" dual roles is considered

Wang, X; Wang, S and Gao, Y (2023) Optimal equity structure of PPP projects when private-sector shareholders' "investor-contractor" dual roles is considered. Construction Management and Economics, 41(11-12), pp. 910-925. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

More often than not, in typical public-private partnership (PPP) projects, the construction contractor (CC) and operating contractor (OC) serve as shareholders simultaneously. CC and OC shareholders have different payback periods and paths, which may result in opportunistic risk. Therefore, an optimal equity structure is required to lower this risk. Based on cooperative game theory, a game model was developed to determine the optimal equity structure between CC and OC. The findings indicate that when the relative complexity of PPP project construction is higher than that of operation, CC should be given a higher equity ratio. Conversely, when the relative complexity of PPP project operation is higher, OC should be given a higher equity ratio. When the construction and operation of the project are equally complex, allocating equity ratios according to market value can reduce transaction costs, based on transaction cost theory. The findings also suggest that increasing CC’s equity ratio can effectively motivate them to better complete the construction work in the long run when the benefits of construction quality are significant. As for OC, increasing bonuses is also an effective incentive method. These findings provide insights into the design of the equity structure of PPP projects to enhance their success.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cooperative game; equity structure; incentive mechanism; PPP projects; “investor-contractor” dual role
Index terms: investor, partnership, construction work, transaction cost, game theory, payback, construction contractor, construction quality, complexity
Subjects: sociology, partnership management, quality assurance, financial analysis, systems engineering, operations management, economic analysis, decision models, practitioner
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here