Wang, Z; Han, F; Xia, B; Liu, J and Zhang, C (2023) Regional differences and heterogeneity of construction and demolition waste with economic growth: Evidence from China. Construction Management and Economics, 41(1), pp. 44-59. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The reduction of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) has a significant impact on the sustainable development of the construction industry. Differentiated reduction management policy is the key to C&DW reduction management. Based on the calculation of C&DW generation, this paper studies the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics, heterogeneity of C&DW with economic growth, and driving factors of C&DW generation in 30 provinces from 2007 to 2018 by using the methods of standard deviation ellipse model, environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and geographic detector. The results show that the C&DW generation in China shows an increasing trend, “low in the west, and high in the East” and “high in the South and low in the north,” with significant regional differences. The temporal and spatial distribution of C&DW generation shows a “northeast southwest” trend, and this pattern has a trend of changing to “due north - due south”; C&DW generation increases with the economic growth, and the proportion of “inverted N” provinces is large, which is in the stage of continuous increase in the C&DW generation; The economic output effect of construction industry is the most important factor affecting the spatial distribution of C&DW generation. The impact of C&DW generation in each province has shifted from the single core driving effect of economy to the common guidance of economy and environmental protection. The interaction of different factors has a greater impact on the spatial distribution of C&DW generation than that of each factor alone.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction and demolition waste; driving factors; ekc model; geographic detector; spatiotemporal characteristics |
| Index terms: | evolution, evidence, China, environmental protection, sustainable development, construction and demolition, construction industry, interaction, economic growth, spatial distribution, deviation |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, waste management, financial and cost management, geographical analysis, environmental science, economic development, Geography, health safety and environment, behavioral psychology, environmental engineering, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here