Addressing youth un/underemployment through construction social procurement: An ecological systems theory perspective

Woolcott, G; Loosemore, M; Keast, R and Chamberlain, D (2023) Addressing youth un/underemployment through construction social procurement: An ecological systems theory perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 41(11-12), pp. 942-960. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Young people’s unemployment and underemployment are acknowledged as serious and enduring problems in Australia and globally. Construction is one of the largest employers of young people, and social procurement of construction products and services has significant potential if harnessed to address this problem. This article argues that project-based intermediation offers critical new insights into how social procurement can be implemented in a construction context. Employing a single case study approach, the article uses ecological systems theory and concept mapping to examine the results of focus groups with twelve young people who transitioned to employment in the Australian construction industry through a unique project-based intermediary set up by a major contractor to meet its social procurement requirements. Addressing the current under-theorisation of social procurement research, this article offers new conceptual insights into the socio-ecological networks that influence young people’s successful transition to employment in construction. The findings also provide new practical insights for government policymakers and the construction industry into the potential role that project-based intermediation can play in addressing youth unemployment in the context of emerging social procurement policies in many countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; employment; intermediaries; social ecology network; social network analysis; social procurement; social value; youth
Index terms: social value, intermediary, construction industry, case study, Australia, ecology, employment, concept mapping, construction product, unemployment, systems theory, focus group, procurement policy, social network analysis
Subjects: sociology, decision analysis, industry analysis, theoretical framing, management, research methods, Geography, public policy, environmental science, economic analysis, data collection methods, business
Topics: Human Resources, Urban Studies, Governance, Sustainability, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here