Fredriksson, A; Janné, M and Peltokorpi, A (2024) Making logistics a central core in complex construction projects: a power-dependency analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 42(11-12), pp. 963-976. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
In complex projects, such as hospital constructions, there are large interdependencies between the actors involved, especially relating to the flow of materials and resources. As new hospital buildings are often built on existing blocks and campuses, ongoing hospital operations may hinder logistics and construction operations and vice versa. To handle these issues, it has become increasingly common to implement construction logistics setups (CLSs). The purpose of the paper is to analyse how the centrality of the CLS in the project organization affects the coordination and conflict level in complex construction project management using a power dependency lens. The study is based on case studies of six hospital projects in the Nordic countries. Based on a cross-case analysis it is identified that: 1) from a logistics management perspective we identify three different foci of the CLS; i) security for hospital patients and staff, ii) on-site material flow coordination, and iii) flow coordination to and from site, and 2) from a project management perspective the main findings point towards the importance of centrality of the CLS in the project management organisation in order to ensure enough power to mandate enforcement of coordination.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction logistics; construction logistics setups; hospital projects; power-dependency theory; case study |
| Index terms: | mandate, construction operation, coordination, complex project, dependency theory, project organization, construction project, construction project management, cross-case analysis, case study, enforcement, logistics management, construction logistics, healthcare building construction, project management |
| Subjects: | production management, strategic project management, supply chain operations, management, health safety and environment, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, organizational theory, political science, construction operations, theoretical framing, project management theory and practice, building construction, construction logistics |
| Topics: | Site Management, Governance, Supply Chain Management, Project Management, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here