Impacts of task interdependence and equivocality on ICT adoption in the construction industry: A task-technology fit view

Hua, Y; Kang, F; Zhang, S and Li, J (2023) Impacts of task interdependence and equivocality on ICT adoption in the construction industry: A task-technology fit view. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(1), pp. 92-109. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Although information and communication technologies (ICTs) are broadly acknowledged as a critical source of competitive advantage in the construction practice, the investment in ICTs in no ways guarantees effective technology adoption and implementation. Based on the Task-Technology Tit (TTF) view, successful adoption of ICT depends on that ICTs fit with the tasks they support and people who use them. Users with different tasks respond to technologies differently. Hence, this paper aims to investigate the linkage among task characteristics (task interdependence and equivocality), personal characteristics, TTF, and users' intention to adopt ICTs. Based on the Structural Equation Model analysis of 205 questionnaires and additional interviews from the construction industry, the findings show that the fit between ICTs and users' tasks contributes positively to ICT adoption; individuals with interdependent and equivocal tasks are more likely to favour ICT adoption; users' educational levels moderate the relationship between task equivocality and ICT adoption. This research extends the TTF view by considering both task and personal characteristics in the technology adoption domain and provides implications for users, managers and software developers to achieve better fit between ICTs, tasks and people.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ict adoption; task equivocality; task interdependence; task-technology fit
Index terms: technology adoption, interdependence, construction industry, implementation, structural equation model, questionnaire, linkage, information and communication technology, guarantee, manager, competitive advantage, interview
Subjects: contractual arrangements, innovation and technology management, practitioner, computing systems, data collection methods, business, industry analysis, statistical analysis, market analysis, organizational analysis, contract structure
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here