Understanding the effect of contractual complexity on regulatory focus in construction projects: the moderating role of organizational culture

Guo, W; Lu, W; Cao, W and Zhang, L (2024) Understanding the effect of contractual complexity on regulatory focus in construction projects: the moderating role of organizational culture. Construction Management and Economics, 42(11-12), pp. 992-1011. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

How the behavioral motivation of each organization is shaped or emerges during the interorganizational transaction deserves more investigation. Drawing on regulatory focus theory, this study delves into the impact of contractual complexity and organizational culture on regulatory focus as behavioral motivation in construction projects. This study dissects contractual complexity into control, coordination, and adaptation grounded in a functional perspective, decomposes regulatory focus into prevention focus and promotion focus, and splits organizational culture into group culture, developmental culture, hierarchical culture, and rational culture. Through validating the empirical data from 411 questionnaires within Chinese construction sector, this study uncovers that contractual control and contractual coordination positively affect prevention focus, while contractual adaptation positively affects promotion focus. Four different types of organizational culture play different moderating roles in the process of stimulating regulatory focus. Organizations with high group culture have a strong driving force for the formation of both regulatory focuses. In contrast, the average level of hierarchical culture, developmental culture, or rational culture is not conducive to the formation of prevention focus or promotion focus. These findings explain how behavioral motivation is impacted by transaction characteristics such as contracts from the perspective of social psychology, confirm the spillover effect of organizational culture of one party at the interorganizational level, and provide suggestions for practitioners on how to develop interorganizational relationships and allocate resources appropriately.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contract in construction projects; contractual complexity; interorganizational relationships; organizational culture; regulatory focus; questionaire survey
Index terms: adaptation, promotion, interorganizational, coordination, prevention, interorganizational relationship, investigation, survey, motivation, drawing, complexity, organizational culture, psychology, construction sector, practitioner, questionnaire, construction project
Subjects: sociology, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, industry analysis, management, financial risk, production management, technical documentation, psychology, business, user focus, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Organizational Design, Human Resources, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here